Admiralty Court revisits seaworthiness in General Average case
The Admiralty Court considers crew competence, passage planning and causation after the HAPPY ARAS grounding.
General information articles on English commercial law, contracts, shipping and trade, arbitration and related practice topics. They are not legal advice and should be read with the article disclaimer.
The articles in this library are by Anthony De Winton, as credited on each page. Their publication dates and historical context matter; hosting an article does not mean Robert wrote it or reviewed its current legal accuracy.
Showing 24 articles.
The Admiralty Court considers crew competence, passage planning and causation after the HAPPY ARAS grounding.
The Privy Council in Rubis Bahamas Ltd v Russell confirms the rule in Rylands v Fletcher and compares it with nuisance and negligence.
Privy Council guidance about reasonable notice for terminating commercial contracts.
The High Court considers how to calculate cargo claim limitation under the Hague-Visby Rules in The THORCO LINEAGE.
The Court of Appeal examines when a commercial contract may imply a duty of good faith in Candey v Bosheh.
How war and related disruption can affect contract performance, including frustration and force majeure clauses.
The UK Supreme Court considers passage planning and a carrier's duty to make a vessel seaworthy under the Hague Rules.
The Court of Appeal considers whether demurrage excludes further damages for a charterer's failure to load or discharge within laytime.
The UK Supreme Court considers how the collision rules apply when vessels meet near a narrow channel.
The UK Supreme Court examines arbitrator bias and the duty to disclose multiple appointments in Halliburton v Chubb.
The UK Supreme Court considers how to determine the law governing an arbitration agreement when the contract and seat point to different laws.
The Bates v Post Office judgment examines implied good-faith duties in relational commercial contracts.
The UK Supreme Court considers the burden of proof in marine cargo claims arising from damage to bagged coffee beans.
The Court of Appeal considers whether digital content supplied electronically counts as “goods” under the Commercial Agents Regulations.
A 2018 examination of the GDPR's territorial reach, including businesses outside the EU that process personal data of people in the EU.
The Court of Appeal interprets “act or neglect” in the Inter-Club Agreement's allocation of cargo-claim liability.
United Kingdom Supreme Court considers whether credit should be given for a benefit arising when assessing damages for breach of contract .
The English court examines whether Hague Rules package limitation applies to bulk cargo in the Aqasia dispute.
The Supreme Court examines retention of title in the O.W. Bunker case, where fuel could be consumed before payment.
An overview of the Consumer Rights Act 2015 and its application to consumer, rather than business, sales.
The Court of Appeal considers retention of title for bunker fuel intended for use before the buyer pays.
The Court of Appeal considers misuse of private information in Vidal-Hall v Google and its relationship to breach of confidence.
A 2016 article on the amended SOLAS VI rules requiring verified gross mass for packed containers before shipment.
The Supreme Court considers when commercial common sense can influence the interpretation of contract terms.
No articles match these filters.